PROGRAM PLANNING and EVALUATION

in HEALTH and MEDICINE

prepared by Martin Rusnak

International Brain Trauma Foundation

Fischhof 3, A-1010 Wien, Austria


rusnakm@healthnet.sk

www.healthnet.sk

OBJECTIVES



PROJECT CYCLE
 
 
STEP 5
STEP 4
STEP 3
STEP 2
STEP 1
Administrative and policy dg Educational and  organizational dg Behavioral and environmental dg Epidemiological dg

Social dg

HEALTH PROMOTION

Health Education

Policy Regulation

Organization

Predisposing Factors

Reinforcing Factors

Enabling Factors

Behaviour and Lifestyle

Environment

Health

Quality of Life

STEP 6
STEP 7
STEP 8
STEP 9
STEP 9
Implementation Process Evaluation Impact Evaluation Outcome Evaluation
Based on Green, L.W., Kreuter, M.W.: Health Promotion Planning. An Educational and Environmental Approach. Myfield Publishing Comp., 1991, 506 pp.
 
 

PLANNING an INTERVENTION into HEALTH RELATED BEHAVIOUR



 
 
ask WHY
before
HOW
Desired Final
OUTCOME
What has to
PRECEDE
that Outcome
EVALUATION
 
PLANNING

PLANNING


Perhaps the most important issue facing the health service is not how it should be organised or financed, but whether the care it provides actually works. This applies not only to particular interventions, but to whole packages of care, and one of the features of the evidence-based approach - systematic review - has been to starkly demonstrate that what we think, or what we believe we know, falls flat when it comes to proof.

ASSESSING QUALITY OF LIFE CONCERNS


Goal:

to determine people's perceptions of their own needs or quality of life , and their aspirations for the common good, through broad participation and the application of multiple information-gathering activities designed to expand understanding of the community.


Methods and Strategies


EPIDEMIOLOGICAL EVIDENCE



 
Goals:


SITUATION ANALYSIS, FEASIBILITY



PRIORITIES



 
 
More important Less imortant
More changeable High priority for program focus Low priority except to demonstrate change for political purposes
Less changeable Priority for innovative program; evaluation crucial No program

PRIORITIES



 
 
More important Less imortant
More changeable Smoking Medical treatment
Less changeable Eating foods with high fatty-acid content
Overeating
Lack of exercise
Not relaxing

 

ASSESSMENTS



 
Resources Needed & Available 

Barriers

Policies
policies, regulations, organizations political forces
time  staff commitment and attitudes  motivation  intra- organizational 
personnel  goal conflict  consistency  inter-organizational 
budget  community barriers  flexibility  system approach 
rate of change , complexity, space  loyalty, discretion  advocacy approach 

 

EVALUATION



 
LEVEL of 
PROJECT  CLUSTER  PROGRAMMING 
POLICYMAKING
consistent, ongoing collection and analysis  how well the collection of projects fulfills the objectives of systematic change  cross-cutting programming and policy questions 

PROJECT-LEVEL EVALUATION



CONTEXT EVALUATION



IMPLEMENTATION EVALUATION



activities enhance the likelihood of success by providing indications what happened and why.
 
 

QUESTIONS ASKED


SPECIFIC QUESTIONS for a NEW PROGRAM



SPECIFIC QUESTIONS for an ESTABLISHED PROGRAM



SPECIFIC QUESTIONS for FUTURE PROGRAM


OUTCOME EVALUATION



assesses the short- and long-term results of a project and seeks to measure the changes brought about by the project.
 


DEVELOPING and IMPLEMENTING an OUTCOME EVALUATION PROCESS - QUESTIONS to be ASKED



SUSTAINABILITY



Activities associated with the project -if not the project itself- may be sustained through state and local monies, funding from other foundations, private donors, or adoption by larger organizations. How successfully projects are able to develop a strategy for the transition from short-term funding sources to long-term funding may determine their future existence.
 

REPLICATION and DISSEMINATION



Projects can replicate or disseminate important lessons learned through publishing journal articles; participating in networks of communities/projects grappling with similar issues; presenting information locally, regionally, or nationally; advising similar projects; or assisting in replicating the project in other communities.
 

IMPACT on POLICY



Research and evaluation rarely affects policy directly; instead policy is influenced by a complex combination of facts, assumptions, ideology, and the personal interests and beliefs of policymakers. At the same time, it is critical to proactively design and utilize evaluation processes and results not only to improve practice, but also to improve and change policies at multiple levels.
 

SUMMARY



SUGGESTED READING